
- 1. Steel choice is a volume decision before it is a metallurgy decision
- 2. The four steel families
- 3. Grade by grade: where each one stops making sense
- 4. What the resin does to the steel
- 5. Polishability and why it costs what it does
- 6. Heat treatment: what changes after machining
- 7. The whole-life cost calculation
- 8. What to write on a mould specification
Steel choice is a volume decision before it is a metallurgy decision
When a mould specification is being written, the steel question usually arrives as "what should we use" and gets answered with a grade name. That is the wrong order. The first question is how many parts the mould will make and what the part has to look like, because those two facts eliminate most of the options before any metallurgy is discussed.
There are three failure modes that steel selection is trying to prevent, and each one dominates at a different volume:
Wear — the cavity erodes, edges round off, and dimensions drift. Dominant in glass-filled resins and high volumes.
Corrosion — PVC, POM, and any resin that releases acidic decomposition products pit the steel. Dominant regardless of volume.
Polishing and detail loss — the steel cannot hold the surface finish or the fine features, so the part looks wrong from the first shot.
The practical rule: below about 100,000 shots, a pre-hardened steel like P20 is almost always correct and anything harder is money spent for a problem you do not have. Between 100,000 and 1,000,000 you are in the range where through-hardened or stainless grades start to earn their price. Above 1,000,000 the decision is about which hardened grade, not whether.
The four steel families
| Family | 예제 | Hardness (HRC) | Character |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-hardened mould steel | P20, 718, 738, 1.2311, 1.2738 | 28 – 34 | Machines easily, no heat treatment after machining, adequate for most work |
| Through-hardened tool steel | H13, 1.2344, S7 | 48 – 54 | Tough, heat resistant, needs hardening after machining, good for engineering resins |
| Stainless mould steel | S136, 1.2083, 420SS, 1.2316 | 30 – 52 | Corrosion resistant, high polishability, essential for PVC and medical |
| Micro-clean / high-polish | NAK80, 1.2714 variants, Stavax ESR | 38 – 42 | Very low inclusion content, mirror polish, optical and cosmetic parts |
Table 1 — The four families. The names differ by supplier and standard (AISI, DIN, JIS) but the families are consistent across them.
The grade naming is a genuine source of confusion in quotations. P20 (AISI) is close to 1.2311 (DIN) and to 718 (ASSAB). S136 (ASSAB) is 1.2083 (DIN) and roughly 420 modified (AISI). When comparing two quotes, compare hardness, delivery condition and heat treatment requirement — not names.
Grade by grade: where each one stops making sense
| Grade | HRC | Cost index | Use up to (shots) | Why you would choose it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P20 / 1.2311 | 30 | 1.0 | 100k | Cheapest machinable option, no heat treatment, fine for commodity parts |
| 718 / 1.2738 | 33 | 1.2 | 300k | Thicker sections harden through better; large moulds stay uniform |
| NAK80 | 40 | 1.6 | 500k | Pre-hardened and polishable to mirror; cosmetic parts without heat treatment |
| 1.2344 / H13 | 50 | 1.8 | 1M+ | Tough and heat resistant; glass-filled engineering resins |
| S136 / 1.2083 | 52 | 2.0 | 1M+ | Corrosion resistance plus polish; PVC, medical, optical |
| 1.2316 | 32 | 1.5 | 500k | Corrosion resistant but pre-hardened; PVC tools that must be machined easily |
| Beryllium copper inserts | 40 | 3.5 | — | Not a mould material; used as inserts where cooling must be aggressive |
Table 2 — Grade selection by volume. The cost index is relative to P20 per kilogram of finished cavity block, before heat treatment.
The volume thresholds are not sharp. A P20 mould running unfilled PP at 60 °C will comfortably exceed 100,000 shots. The same P20 mould running 30% glass-filled PA66 at 290 °C will show edge wear at 40,000. The table assumes a moderate resin; adjust up for unfilled commodity resins and down for filled engineering resins.
What the resin does to the steel
This is where most specification errors happen. The steel is chosen for the volume and then the resin quietly destroys it.
| Resin | Main risk | Steel consequence |
|---|---|---|
| PP, PE, PS | Low wear, no corrosion | P20 is fine; hardness is not the constraint |
| ABS, ASA | Low wear, slight acidity at high temperature | P20 or 718; stainless if the mould will sit idle |
| PC | High melt temperature, high injection pressure | 718 minimum; H13 for long runs; stress on the cavity walls |
| PA6, PA66 | Wear if glass filled; moisture attack on steel | H13 or S136 for filled grades; P20 for unfilled |
| POM | Formaldehyde release corrodes steel | S136 or 1.2316; P20 pits and the pits print on the part |
| PVC (rigid) | HCl release is aggressive | S136 mandatory; chrome plating on P20 is a compromise, not a solution |
| PBT / PET | Wear when glass filled, hydrolysis acidity | H13 or S136 for filled; 718 for unfilled |
| PPS, PEEK | Very high melt temperature (350–400 °C), abrasive | H13 minimum, often hardened to 52+; hot work steel required |
| TPE, TPU | Low wear, but plasticiser attack | P20 or 718; stainless if the compound contains aggressive additives |
Table 3 — Resin-driven steel requirements. POM and PVC are the two that most often catch out a supplier who specified on volume alone.
The POM case is worth spelling out. Polyoxymethylene decomposes to formaldehyde when overheated, and formaldehyde plus moisture plus steel is a corrosion cell. A P20 mould running POM will show pitting in the cavity within a few thousand shots if the melt temperature drifts, and the pits transfer to the part as small raised bumps. It is not a wear problem and no amount of polishing fixes it permanently.
Polishability and why it costs what it does
Polishability is a function of inclusion content and hardness. Inclusions — sulphides, oxides, and in poorly made steel, porosity — are harder or softer than the matrix, so polishing cuts them at a different rate and leaves a surface that looks like a fine orange peel under grazing light.
| Finish requirement | Typical Ra (µm) | Steel requirement |
|---|---|---|
| Textured / matt | 2.0 – 5.0 | Any mould steel |
| Technical finish | 0.4 – 1.0 | P20, 718 |
| Gloss finish | 0.1 – 0.4 | 718, NAK80 |
| High gloss (automotive interior) | 0.05 – 0.1 | NAK80, 1.2738 HH, ESR grades |
| Optical / mirror | < 0.05 | Micro-clean ESR stainless, e.g. Stavax ESR, 1.2083 ESR |
Table 4 — Surface finish versus steel. Above the gloss line, the steel price stops being a small part of the mould cost because polishing hours dominate.
ESR (electro-slag remelted) steel costs 30–60% more than conventionally cast steel of the same grade and is worth it only when the finish requirement is genuinely optical. For an automotive interior gloss part, the difference between a standard 718 and an ESR grade is often visible in the first sample — a faint haze that no amount of additional polishing removes.
Heat treatment: what changes after machining
Pre-hardened steel arrives at 28–34 HRC and is machined in that condition. Through-hardened grades arrive annealed at around 20 HRC, are machined soft, then hardened, quenched and tempered — which means the mould distorts and has to be finish-machined or EDM'd afterwards.
| 단계 | Pre-hardened route | Through-hardened route |
|---|---|---|
| Rough machine | 예 | Yes, in annealed state |
| Stress relieve | Sometimes, for large blocks | Yes, before finish machining |
| Harden + temper | 아니요 | Yes, 1000–1030 °C austenitise, double temper |
| Distortion allowance | 0.05 – 0.1% | 0.3 – 0.5%, must be allowed for |
| Finish machine / EDM | After roughing | After hardening |
| Lead time | 더 짧게 | 2–3 weeks longer |
Table 5 — The two routes through the shop. The through-hardened route is not just harder steel, it is a different manufacturing sequence with different risk.
Distortion is the reason many mould makers push back on hardened steels for large or complex cavities. A 0.4% distortion on a 500 mm block is 2 mm, which has to be removed by EDM or by leaving stock. On a deep ribbed cavity that is expensive and sometimes not possible.
The whole-life cost calculation
The steel price difference between P20 and S136 is real but small compared with what happens if the wrong one is chosen. A mould that fails at 60% of its intended life costs the full mould price plus the production downtime plus the requalification.
| Scenario | Steel cost | Expected life | Cost per 100k shots |
|---|---|---|---|
| P20, unfilled PP, 60 °C mould | 1.0 | 250k | 0.40 |
| P20, 30% GF PA66, 90 °C mould | 1.0 | 40k | 2.50 |
| H13, 30% GF PA66, 90 °C mould | 1.8 | 600k | 0.30 |
| P20, POM, any temperature | 1.0 | 30k (pitting) | 3.30 |
| S136, POM | 2.0 | 800k | 0.25 |
Table 6 — Cost per 100,000 shots for the same cavity block. The two lines where the cheap steel is expensive are the glass-filled and the POM cases, and both are common.
The calculation excludes downtime, which usually dominates. A mould that has to come out for repair during a production campaign costs far more in lost output than in steel. That is the argument for choosing one grade above what the volume strictly requires whenever the part is on a critical delivery schedule.
What to write on a mould specification
A steel specification that a mould maker can quote against should state: cavity and core steel grade with hardness range, the heat treatment route, the surface finish requirement with an Ra value and a reference plaque, the expected production volume, the resin and its fillers, and whether the mould will run in a humid or corrosive environment.
Add one line that is usually missing: what happens at end of life. If the part may run for ten years with volume revisions, a mould designed for insert replacement costs more upfront and far less later. That is a steel-and-construction decision, not just a steel decision.
Is P20 good enough for most injection moulds?
For unfilled commodity resins at moderate volume, yes. P20 at 30 HRC will comfortably run 100,000–250,000 shots in PP, PE, PS or ABS. It stops being adequate with glass-filled resins, with POM or PVC, or when the surface finish requirement is above a technical finish.
Why does POM ruin a P20 mould?
POM decomposes to formaldehyde when overheated, and formaldehyde in the presence of moisture attacks steel. The result is pitting in the cavity, and the pits transfer to the part as small bumps. It is a corrosion failure, not a wear failure, so harder steel does not help — you need stainless.
Do I need stainless steel for PVC?
Yes. Rigid PVC releases hydrogen chloride during processing, and HCl attacks ordinary mould steel quickly. S136 or 1.2316 is standard. Chrome plating a P20 mould is a compromise that works only if the plating is intact; once it scratches, the corrosion starts at the scratch and spreads under the plate.
What is the difference between 718 and P20?
Both are pre-hardened mould steels, but 718 (1.2738) is modified with nickel and holds hardness through thicker sections. A 300 mm thick P20 block will be softer in the middle than at the surface; a 718 block will be more uniform. For large moulds, that difference matters.
When is H13 the right choice?
When you have glass or mineral filled resin, high melt temperature, or volume above roughly a million shots. H13 at 48–52 HRC is tough and heat resistant. It requires hardening after machining, so it adds lead time and distortion risk.
Does a harder mould always last longer?
No. Hardness resists wear, but it does not resist corrosion, and it makes the mould more brittle. A very hard cavity with a sharp internal corner will crack where a softer one would have deformed. Toughness and corrosion resistance often matter more than hardness.
What is ESR steel and when is it worth it?
Electro-slag remelted steel has very low inclusion content, which allows a mirror polish without orange peel. It costs 30–60% more. It is worth it only when the finish requirement is genuinely optical or high-gloss automotive, where the difference is visible on the part.
How much does mould steel affect the mould price?
The cavity block material is typically 10–20% of a mould's total cost. Doubling the steel price adds 10–20% to the mould. Compared with the cost of a premature failure or a rejected cosmetic part, that is usually a cheap insurance premium.
Specifying a new injection mould?
Send us the part drawing, the resin with filler content, the annual volume and the surface finish requirement. We will recommend a steel grade and heat treatment route, and quote the mould with the tool life it is actually rated for.
Continue reading
- Cooling Time in Injection Molding: The Calculation That Sets Cycle Time
- Injection Molding Design Guidelines: 12 Rules That Cut Part Cost
- Injection Molding Defects: 12 Problems, Causes and Fixes
- POM (Acetal) Injection Molding: Thermal Stability and Tooling
- Injection Molding Cost per Part: How the Price Is Really Built











