{"id":7730,"date":"2025-09-05T09:00:00","date_gmt":"2025-09-05T08:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/polycarbonate-vs-acrylic-tube\/"},"modified":"2025-09-05T09:00:00","modified_gmt":"2025-09-05T08:00:00","slug":"polycarbonate-vs-acrylic-tube","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/polycarbonate-vs-acrylic-tube\/","title":{"rendered":"Polycarbonate vs Acrylic Tube: Impact, Clarity, Temperature and Cost"},"content":{"rendered":"<style>\n.upl-blog{font-size:17px;line-height:1.78;color:#1f2937}\n.upl-blog p{margin:0 0 18px}\n.upl-blog h2{font-size:26px;line-height:1.3;color:#0b2b33;margin:46px 0 14px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:-.015em}\n.upl-blog h3{font-size:19.5px;color:#0d3b47;margin:28px 0 10px;font-weight:700}\n.upl-blog ul,.upl-blog ol{margin:0 0 20px;padding-left:22px}\n.upl-blog li{margin:0 0 9px}\n.upl-blog figure{margin:0 0 34px}\n.upl-blog figure img{width:100%;height:auto;display:block;border-radius:10px}\n.upl-blog figcaption{font-size:13px;color:#6b7280;margin-top:10px;line-height:1.5}\n.upl-blog .toc{background:none;border:0;border-radius:0;padding:0;margin:0 0 34px}\n.upl-blog .toc .lwptoc{margin:0}\n.upl-blog .toc h4{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:13px;letter-spacing:.1em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#0d5563}\n.upl-blog .toc ol{margin:0;padding-left:18px;font-size:14.5px}\n.upl-blog .toc li{margin-bottom:6px}\n.upl-blog table{width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:14.5px;margin:0 0 10px}\n.upl-blog th{background:#0d3b47;color:#fff;text-align:left;padding:11px 13px;font-weight:600;font-size:13.5px;border:0}\n.upl-blog td{padding:11px 13px;border:0;border-bottom:1px solid #e8ebed;vertical-align:top}\n.upl-blog tbody tr:nth-child(even){background:#fafbfc}\n.upl-blog .tablecap{font-size:12.5px;color:#6b7280;margin:0 0 30px}\n.upl-blog .myth{background:#fff8ef;border:1px solid #f6ddbd;border-radius:8px;padding:16px 20px;margin:0 0 26px;font-size:15.5px}\n.upl-blog .myth b{color:#a85c10}\n.upl-blog .callout{background:#f2f8f9;border-radius:8px;padding:18px 22px;margin:0 0 26px;font-size:15.5px;border-left:3px solid #14707f}\n.upl-blog .faq h3{border-top:1px solid #eceff1;padding-top:22px;margin-top:0;font-size:18px}\n.upl-blog .faq h3:first-of-type{border-top:0;padding-top:0}\n.upl-blog .cta{background:linear-gradient(135deg,#0b2b33,#0d5563);color:#fff;border-radius:12px;padding:34px;margin:48px 0 30px}\n.upl-blog .cta h2,.upl-blog .cta .cta-h{color:#fff;margin:0 0 10px;font-size:24px;font-weight:700;line-height:1.3}\n.upl-blog .cta p{color:#c9dee3;margin:0 0 20px;font-size:16px}\n.upl-blog .btn{display:inline-block;background:#e07a1f;color:#fff;text-decoration:none;font-weight:700;padding:13px 26px;border-radius:8px;font-size:15.5px}\n.upl-blog .rel{border-top:1px solid #e8ebed;margin-top:40px;padding-top:26px}\n.upl-blog .rel h4{font-size:13px;letter-spacing:.1em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#6b7280;margin:0 0 14px}\n.upl-blog .rel ul{list-style:none;padding:0;margin:0}\n.upl-blog .rel li{padding:11px 0;border-bottom:1px dashed #e8ebed}\n.upl-blog .rel a{text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;font-size:15.5px}\n@media(max-width:640px){.upl-blog h2{font-size:22px}.upl-blog table{font-size:13px}.upl-blog .cta{padding:24px}}\n\/* \u5355\u7bc7\u9875\u9690\u85cf WhatsApp \u81ea\u52a8\u5c55\u5f00\u7684\u95ee\u5019\u5361\uff0c\u53ea\u4fdd\u7559\u5706\u5f62\u6c14\u6ce1\uff0c\u907f\u514d\u906e\u6321\u4fa7\u680f\u8be2\u76d8\u63d0\u4ea4\u6309\u94ae *\/\nbody.single-post .ht_ctc_chat_greetings_box{display:none !important}\n<\/style>\n<div class=\"upl-blog\">\n<figure>\n<img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/polycarbonate-vs-acrylic-tube.jpg\" alt=\"Comparison of polycarbonate and acrylic tube on impact strength, light transmission and service temperature\" width=\"1536\" height=\"909\"><figcaption>Both are clear, both are extruded, and they fail in completely different ways. The choice is usually made by one number, and it is rarely light transmission.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<div class=\"toc\"><\/div>\n<h2 id=\"intro\">Two clear tubes, two different compromises<\/h2>\n<p>Polycarbonate and acrylic are the two transparent thermoplastics that get extruded into tube, and from a metre away they look identical. Up close they are opposites: acrylic is the clearer and more scratch-resistant of the two and shatters; polycarbonate is nearly unbreakable and yellows in sunlight.<\/p>\n<p>Choosing between them is therefore not a matter of \"which is better\" but of which failure mode the application can tolerate. A machine guard that cracks is a safety incident. A display tube that has yellowed is a cosmetic complaint. Those are different risks and they point at different materials.<\/p>\n<div class=\"callout\">\n<p><strong>Ask what happens when it breaks.<\/strong> If the answer is \"someone gets hurt\" or \"the line stops\", specify polycarbonate. If the answer is \"we replace it\", acrylic gives better clarity for less money.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2 id=\"optical\">Optical: transmittance, haze and edge colour<\/h2>\n<p>Acrylic is the clearer material, and the difference is visible on thick sections even though the datasheet numbers look close.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0645\u062a\u0644\u0643\u0627\u062a<\/th>\n<th>\u0628\u0648\u0644\u064a \u0643\u0631\u0628\u0648\u0646\u0627\u062a<\/th>\n<th>\u0623\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0644\u064a\u0643 (PMMA)<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Light transmission (3 mm)<\/td>\n<td>88 \u2013 90%<\/td>\n<td>92%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Haze<\/td>\n<td>0.5 \u2013 1.0%<\/td>\n<td>Under 0.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Refractive index<\/td>\n<td>1.585<\/td>\n<td>1.491<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Edge appearance<\/td>\n<td>Slight grey-green<\/td>\n<td>Bright, light-piping<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Colour shift over 5 years outdoor<\/td>\n<td>Yellow index +3 to +8 without UV grade<\/td>\n<td>Yellow index +1 to +2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Scratch resistance<\/td>\n<td>Poor, needs hard coat<\/td>\n<td>\u062c\u064a\u062f<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p class=\"tablecap\">Table 1 \u2014 Optical comparison. The transmission difference is small; the difference in edge appearance and long-term yellowing is not.<\/p>\n<p>The edge is where acrylic wins visibly. Its higher clarity and lower refractive index make a cut or polished edge glow with light, which is why acrylic tube is used for light guides and illuminated displays. Polycarbonate edges look duller and slightly green by comparison, because of the slight inherent tint in the resin.<\/p>\n<p>Scratch resistance matters more than the datasheet suggests. Polycarbonate scratches at pencil hardness HB and every handling mark shows under light. Acrylic sits around 2H and survives cleaning. Where the tube will be wiped, handled or cleaned regularly, either specify a hard-coated polycarbonate or accept acrylic.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"impact\">Impact: the number that decides most projects<\/h2>\n<p>This is the real difference and it is not marginal. Polycarbonate is roughly thirty to fifty times tougher than acrylic in notched impact, and the failure modes are qualitatively different.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0645\u062a\u0644\u0643\u0627\u062a<\/th>\n<th>\u0628\u0648\u0644\u064a \u0643\u0631\u0628\u0648\u0646\u0627\u062a<\/th>\n<th>\u0623\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0644\u064a\u0643 (PMMA)<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Notched Izod<\/td>\n<td>600 \u2013 900 J\/m<\/td>\n<td>15 \u2013 25 J\/m<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Charpy unnotched<\/td>\n<td>No break<\/td>\n<td>15 \u2013 20 kJ\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Failure mode<\/td>\n<td>Yields, dents, may craze<\/td>\n<td>Shatters into sharp fragments<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Behaviour at \u221220 \u00b0C<\/td>\n<td>Ductile to brittle transition<\/td>\n<td>Brittle<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Behaviour after UV ageing<\/td>\n<td>Degrades if not UV stabilised<\/td>\n<td>Stable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p class=\"tablecap\">Table 2 \u2014 Impact comparison. The notched Izod figures differ by a factor of thirty; the practical difference is that one dents and the other breaks.<\/p>\n<p>Polycarbonate's toughness is not unconditional. It is notch sensitive: a sharp scratch, a machined corner without a radius, or a solvent-induced craze becomes a crack initiation site and the tube fails at a fraction of its rated impact. A polycarbonate tube with a sharp machined groove can be weaker than a plain acrylic tube.<\/p>\n<p>That is why the machining rules matter. Every cut edge should be deburred and every internal corner radiused. A polycarbonate guard that has been drilled with a blunt bit and left with a ragged hole will crack from that hole, and the material will be blamed.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"temperature\">\u062f\u0631\u062c\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0631\u0627\u0631\u0629<\/h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0645\u062a\u0644\u0643\u0627\u062a<\/th>\n<th>\u0628\u0648\u0644\u064a \u0643\u0631\u0628\u0648\u0646\u0627\u062a<\/th>\n<th>\u0623\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0644\u064a\u0643 (PMMA)<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Continuous service<\/td>\n<td>\u221240 to +120 \u00b0C<\/td>\n<td>\u221240 to +80 \u00b0C<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Deflection temperature (1.82 MPa)<\/td>\n<td>128 \u2013 138 \u00b0C<\/td>\n<td>90 \u2013 105 \u00b0C<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Glass transition<\/td>\n<td>147 \u00b0C<\/td>\n<td>105 \u00b0C<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Softening \/ forming range<\/td>\n<td>180 \u2013 220 \u00b0C<\/td>\n<td>150 \u2013 180 \u00b0C<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Thermal expansion<\/td>\n<td>6.5 \u00d7 10\u207b\u2075 \/K<\/td>\n<td>7.0 \u00d7 10\u207b\u2075 \/K<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p class=\"tablecap\">Table 3 \u2014 Thermal comparison. Polycarbonate buys roughly 40 \u00b0C of extra service temperature, which is decisive for anything near a heat source.<\/p>\n<p>Both materials expand about seven times as much as steel, and a 2 m tube moves 2.6\u20132.8 mm over a 20 \u00b0C swing. Any installation that clamps both ends rigidly will either bow the tube or crack it, whichever material is used. One end should always be free to slide.<\/p>\n<p>The 40 \u00b0C difference in service temperature decides a lot of industrial applications. A guard over a motor, a sight glass on a warm process line, a light cover near a lamp \u2014 all of those push acrylic past its limit and leave polycarbonate comfortable.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"chemical\">Chemical resistance<\/h2>\n<p>Neither material is chemically inert, and they fail to different things. This is the section where a wrong choice produces a part that fails in a month.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Chemical<\/th>\n<th>\u0628\u0648\u0644\u064a \u0643\u0631\u0628\u0648\u0646\u0627\u062a<\/th>\n<th>Acrylic<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Water, salt solutions<\/td>\n<td>\u062c\u064a\u062f<\/td>\n<td>\u062c\u064a\u062f<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Dilute acids<\/td>\n<td>\u062c\u064a\u062f<\/td>\n<td>\u062c\u064a\u062f<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Alkalis<\/td>\n<td>Attacked slowly<\/td>\n<td>Attacked, especially strong alkali<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Aliphatic hydrocarbons<\/td>\n<td>Poor \u2014 stress cracks<\/td>\n<td>Poor \u2014 softens<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Aromatic hydrocarbons<\/td>\n<td>Dissolves<\/td>\n<td>Dissolves<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Ketones, esters<\/td>\n<td>Dissolves<\/td>\n<td>Dissolves<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Alcohols<\/td>\n<td>Attacked, crazes under stress<\/td>\n<td>Attacked slowly<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Dichloromethane<\/td>\n<td>Softens<\/td>\n<td>Dissolves \u2014 used as cement<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Ammonia-based cleaners<\/td>\n<td>Stress cracks<\/td>\n<td>Attacked<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Typical industrial oils<\/td>\n<td>\u0645\u0639\u062a\u062f\u0644<\/td>\n<td>\u0645\u0639\u062a\u062f\u0644<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p class=\"tablecap\">Table 4 \u2014 Chemical resistance. Polycarbonate's weakness is stress cracking at low chemical exposure; acrylic's is dissolution at higher exposure.<\/p>\n<p>The polycarbonate failure mode is the more insidious. It does not need to be immersed \u2014 a wipe with an alcohol-based cleaner on a part that is under assembly stress will craze it, and the crazing turns into cracks over weeks. This is why the cleaning agent matters as much as the process fluid: specify a mild soap solution, never a solvent wipe.<\/p>\n<p>Acrylic's failure is more obvious. It softens, frosts or dissolves, and the change is visible immediately. In that sense acrylic is the more forgiving material to specify, because the mistake announces itself.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"machining\">Machining and forming<\/h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Operation<\/th>\n<th>\u0628\u0648\u0644\u064a \u0643\u0631\u0628\u0648\u0646\u0627\u062a<\/th>\n<th>Acrylic<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Sawing<\/td>\n<td>Easy, tends to grab<\/td>\n<td>Easy, chips if too fast<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0641\u0631<\/td>\n<td>Needs sharp bit, slow feed, back-up<\/td>\n<td>Needs slow feed, can chip out<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Tapping<\/td>\n<td>Possible, threads weak<\/td>\n<td>Possible, brittle threads<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Cold bending<\/td>\n<td>Possible to large radius<\/td>\n<td>Not possible \u2014 cracks<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\u0627\u0644\u062a\u0634\u0643\u064a\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0631\u0627\u0631\u064a<\/td>\n<td>Needs drying, 180\u2013220 \u00b0C<\/td>\n<td>Needs drying, 150\u2013180 \u00b0C<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Solvent bonding<\/td>\n<td>Difficult, stress cracking<\/td>\n<td>Excellent with DCM<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\u0627\u0644\u062a\u0644\u0645\u064a\u0639<\/td>\n<td>Difficult, heat-sensitive<\/td>\n<td>Easy, flame or diamond<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Laser cutting<\/td>\n<td>Possible, edges yellow<\/td>\n<td>Excellent, flame-polished edge<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p class=\"tablecap\">Table 5 \u2014 Machining comparison. Acrylic is the easier material to finish; polycarbonate is the easier one to bend without breaking.<\/p>\n<p>Both need drying before thermoforming. Polycarbonate absorbs up to 0.35% moisture and will show bubbles and haze if formed wet; acrylic absorbs less but still needs 2\u20134 hours at 80 \u00b0C. This is the single most common cause of a failed forming trial on either material.<\/p>\n<p>Laser cutting is a clear win for acrylic. A CO\u2082 laser produces a flame-polished edge that needs no further work, and the cut is clean on thicknesses up to 20 mm. Polycarbonate cuts but the edge discolours and the material is prone to micro-cracking along the cut, so a protective film and a nitrogen assist are usually needed.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"uv\">UV and weathering<\/h2>\n<p>Acrylic is inherently UV stable. It does not need an additive, it does not yellow meaningfully over a decade outdoors, and it does not embrittle. This is why it dominates signage and architectural glazing.<\/p>\n<p>Polycarbonate is the opposite. Standard grades yellow within two to three years outdoors, and the yellowing is accompanied by embrittlement \u2014 the surface degrades and the impact strength that justified the material drops away. A UV-stabilised grade slows this; a coextruded UV cap layer is better and is what most outdoor polycarbonate sheet uses.<\/p>\n<p>For a tube, a coextruded cap is difficult, so the practical options are a UV-stabilised compound or a hard coat that also carries UV absorbers. Either way, if the application is outdoors, specify the UV protection explicitly and ask for a weathering data sheet \u2014 the base resin grade alone does not tell you.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"cost\">Cost and specification<\/h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u0645\u0644<\/th>\n<th>\u0628\u0648\u0644\u064a \u0643\u0631\u0628\u0648\u0646\u0627\u062a<\/th>\n<th>Acrylic<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Relative material cost<\/td>\n<td>1.6 \u2013 2.5\u00d7<\/td>\n<td>1.0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Relative tube cost, same OD\/wall<\/td>\n<td>1.5 \u2013 2.2\u00d7<\/td>\n<td>1.0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\u0627\u0644\u0643\u062b\u0627\u0641\u0629<\/td>\n<td>1.20 g\/cm\u00b3<\/td>\n<td>1.19 g\/cm\u00b3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>UV protection<\/td>\n<td>Extra cost, must be specified<\/td>\n<td>Inherent<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Hard coat<\/td>\n<td>Often needed, extra cost<\/td>\n<td>Not needed<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Scrap value<\/td>\n<td>\u0645\u0639\u062a\u062f\u0644<\/td>\n<td>\u0645\u0646\u062e\u0641\u0636\u0629<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p class=\"tablecap\">Table 6 \u2014 Cost comparison. The material premium for polycarbonate is 1.6\u20132.5\u00d7, and the UV and coating requirements widen it further.<\/p>\n<p>When specifying either, five things belong on the drawing: outside diameter and tolerance, wall thickness and tolerance, length and tolerance, the grade (including UV or hard coat), and the end finish. \"Clear tube\" is not a specification, and the difference between an as-extruded end and a polished end is a visible cost.<\/p>\n<p>Concentricity is the item most often left off. A tube with 0.3 mm of eccentricity will look fine until it is used as a bearing surface or a sight glass, at which point the optical distortion becomes obvious. Specify concentricity, not just wall thickness.<\/p>\n<div class=\"faq\">\n<h3>Is polycarbonate or acrylic better for a machine guard?<\/h3>\n<p>Polycarbonate, without question. It dents rather than shatters, and a guard that fails is a safety incident. Accept the lower clarity and the extra cost.<\/p>\n<h3>Why has my polycarbonate tube turned yellow?<\/h3>\n<p>UV degradation of an unstabilised grade. Standard polycarbonate yellows outdoors within two to three years and embrittles as it does. For outdoor use, specify a UV-stabilised compound or a UV-blocking hard coat.<\/p>\n<h3>Can acrylic tube be used outdoors?<\/h3>\n<p>Yes. Acrylic is inherently UV stable and does not need additives. It will last a decade or more outdoors without meaningful yellowing, which is why it dominates signage.<\/p>\n<h3>Which is clearer, PC or acrylic?<\/h3>\n<p>Acrylic, at 92% transmission against 88\u201390% for polycarbonate, and with lower haze. The difference is small on thin sections and obvious on thick ones, especially at the cut edge.<\/p>\n<h3>Can I bend polycarbonate tube cold?<\/h3>\n<p>To a large radius, yes. Acrylic cannot be cold bent at all \u2014 it cracks. For tight radii, both need to be heated.<\/p>\n<h3>Why did my polycarbonate part crack after cleaning?<\/h3>\n<p>Stress cracking from a solvent. Alcohols, ammonia-based cleaners and many industrial degreasers craze polycarbonate under stress, and the craze becomes a crack. Use mild soap and water, and relieve assembly stress.<\/p>\n<h3>What temperature can each handle?<\/h3>\n<p>Polycarbonate to about 120 \u00b0C continuous, acrylic to about 80 \u00b0C. Both are fine at \u221240 \u00b0C, though acrylic becomes brittle and impact-sensitive when cold.<\/p>\n<h3>Which is easier to machine?<\/h3>\n<p>Acrylic finishes more easily \u2014 it polishes, flame-polishes and solvent-bonds well. Polycarbonate machines without chipping but is hard to polish and stress-cracks around drilled holes if the tooling is blunt.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"cta\">\n<p class=\"cta-h\">Need clear tube in PC or acrylic?<\/p>\n<p>Tell us the diameter, wall, length and what the tube has to survive \u2014 impact, temperature, cleaning chemicals or sunlight. We will tell you which material fits and what the tolerance should realistically be.<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"btn\" href=\"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/%d8%a8%d8%ab%d9%82-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%a3%d9%86%d8%a7%d8%a8%d9%8a%d8%a8-%d9%88%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%a3%d9%86%d8%a7%d8%a8%d9%8a%d8%a8\/\">Talk to a tube extrusion engineer<\/a>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"rel\">\n<h4>Continue reading<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/plastic-pipe-extrusion-guide\/\">Plastic Pipe Extrusion: Materials, Standards and Sourcing<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/cast-vs-extruded-acrylic-rod\/\">Cast vs Extruded Acrylic Rod: Which One to Specify<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/pc-injection-molding-guide\/\">PC Injection Molding: Drying, Melt Temperature and Stress Cracking<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/solid-rod-profile-extrusion\/\">Solid Rod Profile Extrusion: Cooling, Die Swell and Internal Voids<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/acrylic-rod-specification-guide\/\">Acrylic Rod Sizes, Tolerances and Straightness<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Two clear tubes that fail in completely different ways. The choice is usually made by one number, notched impact, and it is rarely light transmission.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7722,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_titles_title":"Polycarbonate vs Acrylic Tube: Impact, Clarity, Temperature","_seopress_titles_desc":"Two clear tubes that fail in completely different ways. The choice is usually made by one number, notched impact, and it is rarely light transmission.","_seopress_robots_index":"","_seopress_robots_follow":"","_seopress_robots_imageindex":"","_seopress_robots_snippet":"","_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"17","_seopress_robots_breadcrumbs":"","_seopress_robots_freeze_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_custom_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_canonical":"","_seopress_social_fb_title":"","_seopress_social_fb_desc":"","_seopress_social_fb_img":"","_seopress_social_fb_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_height":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_title":"","_seopress_social_twitter_desc":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_height":0,"_seopress_redirections_value":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled_regex":"","_seopress_redirections_logged_status":"","_seopress_redirections_param":"","_seopress_redirections_type":0,"_seopress_analysis_target_kw":"polycarbonate vs acrylic tube","footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7730","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-plastic-extrusion-process"],"meta_box":{"post-to-quiz_to":[]},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7730","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7730"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7730\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7722"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7730"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7730"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7730"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}