{"id":7694,"date":"2025-08-25T09:00:00","date_gmt":"2025-08-25T08:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/spring-back-thermoformed-parts\/"},"modified":"2025-08-25T09:00:00","modified_gmt":"2025-08-25T08:00:00","slug":"spring-back-thermoformed-parts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/spring-back-thermoformed-parts\/","title":{"rendered":"Spring-Back and Dimensional Control in Thermoformed Parts"},"content":{"rendered":"<style>\n.upl-blog{font-size:17px;line-height:1.78;color:#1f2937}\n.upl-blog p{margin:0 0 18px}\n.upl-blog h2{font-size:26px;line-height:1.3;color:#0b2b33;margin:46px 0 14px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:-.015em}\n.upl-blog h3{font-size:19.5px;color:#0d3b47;margin:28px 0 10px;font-weight:700}\n.upl-blog ul,.upl-blog ol{margin:0 0 20px;padding-left:22px}\n.upl-blog li{margin:0 0 9px}\n.upl-blog figure{margin:0 0 34px}\n.upl-blog figure img{width:100%;height:auto;display:block;border-radius:10px}\n.upl-blog figcaption{font-size:13px;color:#6b7280;margin-top:10px;line-height:1.5}\n.upl-blog .toc{background:none;border:0;border-radius:0;padding:0;margin:0 0 34px}\n.upl-blog .toc .lwptoc{margin:0}\n.upl-blog .toc h4{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:13px;letter-spacing:.1em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#0d5563}\n.upl-blog .toc ol{margin:0;padding-left:18px;font-size:14.5px}\n.upl-blog .toc li{margin-bottom:6px}\n.upl-blog table{width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:14.5px;margin:0 0 10px}\n.upl-blog th{background:#0d3b47;color:#fff;text-align:left;padding:11px 13px;font-weight:600;font-size:13.5px;border:0}\n.upl-blog td{padding:11px 13px;border:0;border-bottom:1px solid #e8ebed;vertical-align:top}\n.upl-blog tbody tr:nth-child(even){background:#fafbfc}\n.upl-blog .tablecap{font-size:12.5px;color:#6b7280;margin:0 0 30px}\n.upl-blog .myth{background:#fff8ef;border:1px solid #f6ddbd;border-radius:8px;padding:16px 20px;margin:0 0 26px;font-size:15.5px}\n.upl-blog .myth b{color:#a85c10}\n.upl-blog .callout{background:#f2f8f9;border-radius:8px;padding:18px 22px;margin:0 0 26px;font-size:15.5px;border-left:3px solid #14707f}\n.upl-blog .faq h3{border-top:1px solid #eceff1;padding-top:22px;margin-top:0;font-size:18px}\n.upl-blog .faq h3:first-of-type{border-top:0;padding-top:0}\n.upl-blog .cta{background:linear-gradient(135deg,#0b2b33,#0d5563);color:#fff;border-radius:12px;padding:34px;margin:48px 0 30px}\n.upl-blog .cta h2,.upl-blog .cta .cta-h{color:#fff;margin:0 0 10px;font-size:24px;font-weight:700;line-height:1.3}\n.upl-blog .cta p{color:#c9dee3;margin:0 0 20px;font-size:16px}\n.upl-blog .btn{display:inline-block;background:#e07a1f;color:#fff;text-decoration:none;font-weight:700;padding:13px 26px;border-radius:8px;font-size:15.5px}\n.upl-blog .rel{border-top:1px solid #e8ebed;margin-top:40px;padding-top:26px}\n.upl-blog .rel h4{font-size:13px;letter-spacing:.1em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#6b7280;margin:0 0 14px}\n.upl-blog .rel ul{list-style:none;padding:0;margin:0}\n.upl-blog .rel li{padding:11px 0;border-bottom:1px dashed #e8ebed}\n.upl-blog .rel a{text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;font-size:15.5px}\n@media(max-width:640px){.upl-blog h2{font-size:22px}.upl-blog table{font-size:13px}.upl-blog .cta{padding:24px}}\n\/* \u5355\u7bc7\u9875\u9690\u85cf WhatsApp \u81ea\u52a8\u5c55\u5f00\u7684\u95ee\u5019\u5361\uff0c\u53ea\u4fdd\u7559\u5706\u5f62\u6c14\u6ce1\uff0c\u907f\u514d\u906e\u6321\u4fa7\u680f\u8be2\u76d8\u63d0\u4ea4\u6309\u94ae *\/\nbody.single-post .ht_ctc_chat_greetings_box{display:none !important}\n<\/style>\n<div class=\"upl-blog\">\n<figure>\n<img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/spring-back-thermoformed-parts.jpg\" alt=\"Diagram showing a thermoformed part springing back from the mould surface after demoulding, with shrinkage and spring-back directions labelled\" width=\"1536\" height=\"909\"><figcaption>The part never keeps the shape of the tool. It shrinks as it cools, and it springs back from the tool surface the moment the vacuum is released.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<div class=\"toc\"><\/div>\n<h2 id=\"two\">Two different things happen after demould<\/h2>\n<p>A thermoformed part leaves the tool at the wrong size. Not because the tool is wrong, but because two independent effects act on the part between the forming station and the trimming fixture.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u0627\u0644\u0627\u0646\u0643\u0645\u0627\u0634<\/strong> is thermal contraction as the part cools from forming temperature to room temperature. It is uniform in direction, proportional to the temperature drop, and predictable from the material's coefficient of thermal expansion.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Spring-back<\/strong> is elastic recovery. While the part is on the tool it is held against the surface by vacuum. When the vacuum is released, the material \u2014 which was stretched during forming \u2014 relaxes towards its unstretched shape. The result is that radii open up, walls straighten slightly, and the part moves away from the tool surface.<\/p>\n<div class=\"callout\">\n<p><strong>The practical consequence:<\/strong> you cannot compensate for both with one number. Shrinkage is a scale factor; spring-back is a shape change. A tool scaled up by 1.5% to compensate for shrinkage will still produce parts whose radii are wrong.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2 id=\"shrinkage\">Shrinkage: the predictable part<\/h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u0627\u062f<\/th>\n<th>Typical shrinkage<\/th>\n<th>Direction<\/th>\n<th>\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0644\u0627\u062d\u0638\u0627\u062a<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>\u0645\u0644\u0627\u062d\u0638\u0629<\/td>\n<td>0.4 \u2013 0.6%<\/td>\n<td>Fairly uniform<\/td>\n<td>Low and predictable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>HIPS<\/td>\n<td>0.4 \u2013 0.7%<\/td>\n<td>Fairly uniform<\/td>\n<td>Similar to PS<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>ABS<\/td>\n<td>0.4 \u2013 0.7%<\/td>\n<td>Fairly uniform<\/td>\n<td>Good dimensional stability<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>PVC (rigid)<\/td>\n<td>0.3 \u2013 0.6%<\/td>\n<td>Fairly uniform<\/td>\n<td>Low shrinkage; good for large parts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>PETG<\/td>\n<td>0.2 \u2013 0.5%<\/td>\n<td>Fairly uniform<\/td>\n<td>Low; good dimensional control<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\u0628 \u0645 \u0623 \u0645 \u0623<\/td>\n<td>0.3 \u2013 0.6%<\/td>\n<td>Fairly uniform<\/td>\n<td>\u0645\u0646\u062e\u0641\u0636\u0629<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\u0643\u0645\u0628\u064a\u0648\u062a\u0631 \u0634\u062e\u0635\u064a<\/td>\n<td>0.5 \u2013 0.7%<\/td>\n<td>Fairly uniform<\/td>\n<td>Needs hot mould to minimise stress<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\u0635<\/td>\n<td>1.2 \u2013 2.0%<\/td>\n<td>Higher in flow direction<\/td>\n<td>Crystalline; significant and directional<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0648\u0644\u064a \u0625\u064a\u062b\u064a\u0644\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0627\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0643\u062b\u0627\u0641\u0629<\/td>\n<td>1.5 \u2013 2.5%<\/td>\n<td>Higher in flow direction<\/td>\n<td>Crystalline; the hardest to control<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p class=\"tablecap\">Table 1 \u2014 Thermal shrinkage by material. The amorphous resins are half the value of the crystalline ones, which is why PS and ABS dominate dimensionally critical parts.<\/p>\n<p>Crystalline materials shrink more and shrink directionally, because the crystals form in the direction of stretch. A PP part will be smaller in the machine direction than across it, and the difference can be 0.5% or more. That is why PP is rarely used for parts where two dimensions have to be equally accurate.<\/p>\n<p>The compensation is straightforward: scale the tool by the shrinkage factor. A 1.5% shrinkage means the tool is made 1.5% larger than the nominal part. The complication is that shrinkage depends on the actual cooling history, so the number from a data sheet is a starting point, not a specification.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"springback\">Spring-back: the shape change<\/h2>\n<p>Spring-back happens because the sheet is stretched during forming and the stretch is elastic to some degree. When the vacuum releases, the elastic component recovers.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>\u0627\u0644\u0645\u064a\u0632\u0629<\/th>\n<th>Spring-back effect<\/th>\n<th>Magnitude<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Inside radius<\/td>\n<td>Opens up (radius increases)<\/td>\n<td>0.5 \u2013 3 mm on a 5 mm radius<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Wall angle<\/td>\n<td>Opens away from the tool<\/td>\n<td>0.5 \u2013 2\u00b0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Flat bottom<\/td>\n<td>Bowes towards the tool side<\/td>\n<td>0.5 \u2013 2 mm over 300 mm<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Deep draw walls<\/td>\n<td>Straighten slightly<\/td>\n<td>Visible on long walls<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Ribs and details<\/td>\n<td>Shallower than the tool<\/td>\n<td>Proportional to depth<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Overall height<\/td>\n<td>Slightly taller or shorter<\/td>\n<td>Depends on geometry<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p class=\"tablecap\">Table 2 \u2014 What spring-back does to features. Radii and wall angles are the most affected and the most visible on an assembled part.<\/p>\n<p>The magnitude depends on how much the material was stretched. A shallow part formed with little stretch springs back very little; a deep draw with high stretch springs back significantly. That is why the same material and the same thickness can produce parts with different spring-back on different tools.<\/p>\n<p>There is also a time element. Some spring-back is immediate (elastic recovery on vacuum release), and some develops over hours as residual stress relaxes. A part measured five minutes after demould and the same part measured a day later will not be identical.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"compensate\">Compensating in the tool<\/h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>\u0627\u0644\u0646\u0647\u062c<\/th>\n<th>What you change<\/th>\n<th>Works for<\/th>\n<th>Limitation<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Scale the tool<\/td>\n<td>Multiply all dimensions by (1 + shrinkage)<\/td>\n<td>\u0627\u0644\u0627\u0646\u0643\u0645\u0627\u0634<\/td>\n<td>Does nothing for spring-back<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Adjust radii<\/td>\n<td>Make the tool radius smaller than nominal<\/td>\n<td>Radius opening<\/td>\n<td>Needs trial data<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Add draft<\/td>\n<td>Increase wall angle on the tool<\/td>\n<td>Wall opening<\/td>\n<td>Changes the part design<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Crown the base<\/td>\n<td>Make the tool base convex<\/td>\n<td>Base bowing<\/td>\n<td>Only for flat-bottomed parts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Over-form<\/td>\n<td>Form deeper, then trim to length<\/td>\n<td>Height changes<\/td>\n<td>Adds material and trim cost<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Trial and correct<\/td>\n<td>Measure the first parts, adjust the tool<\/td>\n<td>Everything<\/td>\n<td>Costs a tool revision<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p class=\"tablecap\">Table 3 \u2014 Tool compensation methods. In practice every tool needs a trial-and-correct cycle; the question is how well you can predict the first attempt.<\/p>\n<p>The economics of tool correction are worth understanding. A first tool that is 95% right needs a small revision, which costs a fraction of the tool. A first tool that ignores spring-back entirely can need a re-make. Spending an extra day on the design to predict spring-back is usually cheaper than the revision.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"process\">Process levers that change spring-back<\/h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Lever<\/th>\n<th>Effect on spring-back<\/th>\n<th>Effect on other things<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Higher sheet temperature<\/td>\n<td>Less spring-back (more relaxation)<\/td>\n<td>Faster cycle needed; risk of sag<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Higher mould temperature<\/td>\n<td>Less spring-back<\/td>\n<td>Longer cooling<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Slower forming<\/td>\n<td>Less spring-back<\/td>\n<td>Longer cycle<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Plug assist<\/td>\n<td>More uniform stretch, less variation<\/td>\n<td>Extra tooling<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Higher vacuum \/ pressure<\/td>\n<td>Better contact, slightly less spring-back<\/td>\n<td>Marks, more vent wear<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Longer hold on vacuum<\/td>\n<td>Part sets closer to tool shape<\/td>\n<td>\u0632\u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0648\u0631\u0629<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p class=\"tablecap\">Table 4 \u2014 Process levers. Temperature is the strongest: a hotter sheet and a hotter tool both reduce spring-back, at the cost of cycle time.<\/p>\n<p>Hotter is not always better. A sheet that is too hot sags before forming and thins excessively at the bottom of the draw, which creates its own dimensional problems. The window is the same one that governs forming quality generally, and spring-back is a secondary consideration within it.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"measure\">Measuring and predicting<\/h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Measurement<\/th>\n<th>When<\/th>\n<th>What it tells you<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Part dimensions at demould<\/td>\n<td>Immediately<\/td>\n<td>Forming accuracy, before relaxation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Part dimensions at 1 h<\/td>\n<td>1 hour after<\/td>\n<td>Most of the immediate relaxation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Part dimensions at 24 h<\/td>\n<td>Next day<\/td>\n<td>The settled dimension \u2014 this is what the customer measures<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Part dimensions at 72 h<\/td>\n<td>Three days<\/td>\n<td>Confirms the part has stopped moving<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Comparison to tool CAD<\/td>\n<td>At 24 h<\/td>\n<td>The correction factor for the next tool<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p class=\"tablecap\">Table 5 \u2014 Measurement schedule. The 24-hour dimension is the one that matters; anything measured sooner is optimistic.<\/p>\n<p>Building a correction record is the most valuable thing a thermoformer can do. For each material, thickness and draw depth, record the measured dimension at 24 hours against the tool dimension. After a dozen parts you have a correction table that lets the next tool be right first time.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"design\">Design rules that reduce the problem<\/h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Rule<\/th>\n<th>\u0644\u0645\u0627\u0630\u0627<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Generous radii (1\u00d7 thickness minimum)<\/td>\n<td>Tight radii spring back proportionally more<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Draft of 3\u20135\u00b0 minimum<\/td>\n<td>Compensates for wall opening and aids release<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Avoid long flat bottoms<\/td>\n<td>They bow; add ribs or crown the tool<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Keep draw ratio under 1:1 depth to width<\/td>\n<td>Deeper draws stretch more and spring back more<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Put critical dimensions on formed features, not trimmed edges<\/td>\n<td>Trimmed edges add their own variation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Specify tolerance by feature, not by part<\/td>\n<td>Some features hold much better than others<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p class=\"tablecap\">Table 6 \u2014 Design rules. The tolerance allocation rule is the most commercially useful: putting a tight tolerance on a feature that cannot hold it causes most of the arguments.<\/p>\n<p>The draw ratio rule is worth stating as a number. Above about 1:1 (depth equal to width), wall thinning and spring-back both increase sharply, and the part becomes hard to control. If a design needs a deeper draw, pressure forming or a different process is worth considering.<\/p>\n<div class=\"faq\">\n<h3>Why is my thermoformed part the wrong size?<\/h3>\n<p>Two reasons: shrinkage and spring-back. Shrinkage makes the whole part smaller and is compensated by scaling the tool. Spring-back changes the shape \u2014 radii open, walls straighten \u2014 and is not fixed by scaling. Measure at 24 hours and correct the tool for both.<\/p>\n<h3>How much does thermoformed plastic shrink?<\/h3>\n<p>0.3\u20130.7% for amorphous resins (PS, ABS, PVC, PC, PETG) and 1.2\u20132.5% for crystalline ones (PP, HDPE). Crystalline materials also shrink directionally, which makes them harder to hold on two dimensions at once.<\/p>\n<h3>What is a typical spring-back?<\/h3>\n<p>Radii open by 0.5\u20133 mm on a 5 mm radius, wall angles open by 0.5\u20132\u00b0, and flat bottoms bow by 0.5\u20132 mm over 300 mm. The amount depends on how much the material was stretched, so deeper draws spring back more.<\/p>\n<h3>Can I eliminate spring-back?<\/h3>\n<p>No, but you can reduce it and compensate for it. Hotter sheet, hotter mould and slower forming all reduce it. The rest is tool compensation: make the radii smaller than nominal and add draft so that the opened-up part lands on the drawing.<\/p>\n<h3>Why do dimensions change over the first day?<\/h3>\n<p>Residual stress relaxation. The part leaves the tool with stress locked in, and over hours it creeps towards a lower-energy shape. Measuring at 24 hours captures the settled dimension; measuring at five minutes gives a number the customer will never see.<\/p>\n<h3>Should I measure the part on the tool or off it?<\/h3>\n<p>Off the tool, at 24 hours, at room temperature. Measuring on the tool tells you about the tool, not the part. Any dimension that only works while the part is clamped is not a dimension.<\/p>\n<h3>Does trimming change the dimensions?<\/h3>\n<p>Yes \u2014 trimming releases the constraint of the flange, and the part can move. That is why trimming should happen before final measurement, and why the trim fixture should be designed around the settled shape, not the CAD shape.<\/p>\n<h3>Can I use the same tool correction for a different material?<\/h3>\n<p>No. Shrinkage differs by a factor of three between amorphous and crystalline resins, and spring-back differs with stiffness. Each material and thickness combination needs its own correction, which is why the correction record is per combination.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"cta\">\n<p class=\"cta-h\">Parts not matching the drawing after forming?<\/p>\n<p>Send us the part drawing, material, gauge and the dimensions you are actually getting at 24 hours. We will separate shrinkage from spring-back and tell you what to change on the tool.<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"btn\" href=\"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%aa%d8%b4%d9%83%d9%8a%d9%84-%d8%a8%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%aa%d9%81%d8%b1%d9%8a%d8%ba\/\">Talk to a thermoforming engineer<\/a>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"rel\">\n<h4>Continue reading<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/trimming-vacuum-formed-parts\/\">Trimming Vacuum Formed Parts: CNC, Fixtures and Edge Quality<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/vacuum-forming-cooling-cycle-time\/\">Cooling and Cycle Time in Vacuum Forming<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/vacuum-forming-wall-thickness\/\">Wall Thickness in Vacuum Forming: Why Corners Thin<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/vacuum-forming-tooling-cost\/\">Vacuum Forming Tooling Cost: What Drives the Price<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/pressure-forming-vs-vacuum-forming\/\">Pressure Forming vs Vacuum Forming<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Thermoformed parts do not hold the mould they were formed on. Shrinkage, spring-back and the compensation that has to be built into the pattern.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7688,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_titles_title":"Spring-Back and Dimensional Control in Thermoformed Parts","_seopress_titles_desc":"Thermoformed parts do not hold the mould they were formed on. Shrinkage, spring-back and the compensation that has to be built into the pattern.","_seopress_robots_index":"","_seopress_robots_follow":"","_seopress_robots_imageindex":"","_seopress_robots_snippet":"","_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"29","_seopress_robots_breadcrumbs":"","_seopress_robots_freeze_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_custom_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_canonical":"","_seopress_social_fb_title":"","_seopress_social_fb_desc":"","_seopress_social_fb_img":"","_seopress_social_fb_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_height":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_title":"","_seopress_social_twitter_desc":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_height":0,"_seopress_redirections_value":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled_regex":"","_seopress_redirections_logged_status":"","_seopress_redirections_param":"","_seopress_redirections_type":0,"_seopress_analysis_target_kw":"spring back thermoformed parts","footnotes":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7694","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-vacuum-forming"],"meta_box":{"post-to-quiz_to":[]},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7694","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7694"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7694\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7688"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7694"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7694"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uplastech.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7694"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}